The position paper, "Forests, Water and Development: Seeking Effective Ways of Utilizing Our Resources" (2005), by Dirk Versfeld and Mike Warren from South Africa’s Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, explores sustainable forestry models to address water scarcity and rural development needs. The paper suggests a transition from fast-growing exotic tree plantations, such as pine and eucalyptus, to slower-growing, high-value indigenous species. These alternatives would require less water, support biodiversity, and provide socio-economic benefits for rural communities.
### Key Points
1. Water Conservation: Fast-growing plantations consume significant water, impacting local water resources. Switching to slow-growing species could mitigate these effects and offer a sustainable approach to managing water resources in water-scarce areas.
2. Rural Development: Indigenous tree plantations could empower rural communities by providing high-value timber, traditional medicines, and multiple-use benefits. Unlike the fast-profit model, these slower systems promise longer-term economic and environmental sustainability.
3. Economic Viability: The shift to slower-growing trees challenges traditional forestry economics, as it delays returns on investment. However, multiple benefits—such as honey, medicinal products, and ecotourism—could provide interim income. Additionally, this model aligns with environmental regulations aimed at water conservation.
4. Regulatory Support: Since forestry is recognized as a major water user, regulations under the National Water Act now restrict expansion in stressed catchments. A phased transition from fast-growing to slow-growing species could allow forestry to adapt sustainably within these limits.
5. Ecological and Social Benefits: Indigenous plantations can restore degraded lands, reduce the need for water infrastructure, and support biodiversity. Encouraging mixed-use forestry models would also promote ecotourism and community-based forest management.
6. Policy and Research Needs: This model requires new policies, research into site-species matching, and financial incentives for long-term forestry investments. The paper calls for a collaborative effort between government, industry, and communities to adopt this sustainable forestry paradigm.
### Conclusion
The authors advocate for a reimagined South African forestry sector that prioritizes water efficiency, rural development, and ecological integrity, envisioning forestry as a tool for social and environmental improvement rather than solely for profit maximization.
Read paper here